This review presents a critical evaluation of methodological quality in controlled
trials on homeopathic treatment of influenza. First, a short summary on the prevalence,
quality, and most commonly cited shortcomings of homeopathic controlled trials in
general is presented to support the more specific points within influenza trials alone.
To this end, three areas of the homeopathic literature are examined; large meta-analyses
looking at study quality and results across research areas, reviews on research within
specific diagnostic categories, and the available reviews and primary studies on influenza
treatment trials. The specific methodological designs of homeopathic influenza treatment
trials are then compared, on a point by point basis, to pharmaceutical trials on influenza
antiviral drugs. The goal of the evaluation is to highlight frequently cited problems
in homeopathic trial design, suggest possible improvement for future studies, and
make specific recommendations for homeopathic influenza trials based on a comparison
to standard antiviral trials.
Keywords
Influenza - Homeopathic controlled trials - Randomized controlled trials - Homeopathy
- Study quality - Design methodology